Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pride Proclamation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Copperas Cove mayor declines Pride proclamation after heated public comment
Summary
After more than a dozen residents spoke for and against a requested Pride (LGBTQIA+) proclamation, the mayor announced he would not issue the proclamation, saying it is ceremonial and 'does not provide benefit to the greater good'; supporters urged the council to affirm inclusion, while opponents cited faith and traditional values.
Supporters urged the Copperas Cove City Council to issue a Pride proclamation that recognizes LGBTQIA residents as part of the community; opponents said the city should not 'officially celebrate or endorse' views they believe conflict with their religious convictions. After public comment, the mayor said he would not issue the requested proclamation.
Sheena Tanner, who identified herself and told the council she represents local residents who feel unseen, told the council: "A proclamation cannot solve every challenge facing LGBTQIA youth or adults, but symbols matter" and that an acknowledgment from the city "sends a message that every resident deserves dignity, safety, and respect." Several other speakers, including veterans, business owners and a local candidate, echoed that recognition of a marginalized group can be an act of inclusion and can have economic and social benefits.
Pastor Kirby Lack, speaking on behalf of the Coryell County Republican Party, told council that his organization "respectfully, firmly oppose[s] the LGBTQ proclamation," arguing that local government should not issue a statement that conflicts with biblical convictions. Other speakers asked whether taxpayer money would be used for any promotional activity tied to a proclamation; supporters and staff repeatedly said a proclamation is ceremonial and typically requires no special funding.
City Manager Ryan Havela and staff explained that proclamations are ceremonial and lack binding authority under city charter and state law. After listening to speakers and council discussion, the mayor said: "Based on the general application of the city's charter and state law, the issuance of proclamations are primarily ceremonial in nature and as such lack any binding authority ... I do not feel such proclamation provides benefit to the greater good of the community and will not issue the request of proclamation." The mayor also thanked residents for their decorum.
Several council members suggested developing a short policy letter to guide future proclamation requests and suggested keeping that guidance to a maximum of two pages. No formal council vote was taken on the proclamation request during the meeting.
The matter remains a political issue in Copperas Cove: supporters said a proclamation is a low-cost way to communicate inclusion and support to residents who feel marginalized; opponents said it crosses into endorsing an ideology. Council did not adopt a citywide policy at the meeting; some members asked staff to draft a brief policy for future consideration.
