Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board advances several zoning amendments to public hearing, splits ADU and food-service items
Summary
The board voted to send multiple zoning amendments to public hearing — separating accessory-dwelling-unit and food-service-definition items for individual consideration — and agreed to language changes on parking, lot coverage and temporary signage for the public hearing packet.
The Waterville Valley Planning Board moved a package of zoning amendments to public hearing and agreed to present potentially controversial items — notably accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and the food-service-establishment definition — as separate warrant articles.
Members said bundling several definition updates into a single ballot item could cause unrelated changes to fail if voters object to a single element. The board agreed to split out the ADU and food-service language and to present the remaining definition edits together.
On ADUs, board members reviewed state guidance and resolved to limit ADU size on the face of the warrant to a maximum of 950 square feet unless the municipality authorizes an exception; they also discussed, and largely supported, placing any prohibition on short-term rentals in ADUs into the short-term-rental section of the ordinance so it would not defeat the ADU language at the ballot.
The board also approved drafting amendments to clarify that required off-street parking must be paved and striped (10-by-20-foot dimensions), and to require parking plans to show dimensions so the board can verify the number of feasible spaces. Staff recommended making lot coverage explicit as the percentage of a lot covered by impervious surfaces to align multiple district sections.
Sign regulations were another notable item: planning and code staff told the board that current rules produce 'workarounds' — applicants applying for permanent signs and using them temporarily — and recommended permitting a limited temporary sign allowance for single-family homes subject to select-board permit standards, rather than the current blanket prohibition.
All of these items were sent to public hearing for further public comment and legal review; the board’s staff said it would circulate the final proposed wording and explanatory materials ahead of the hearing.
