Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Art Sculpture topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Shell Lake council sends donated sculpture back to Plan Commission after veterans raise concerns

City Council, City of Shell Lake · August 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After residents and veterans said a donated sculpture did not fit Memorial Park, the City Council unanimously voted to send acceptance and placement back to the Plan Commission for reconsideration.

The Shell Lake City Council on Aug. 11 unanimously voted to return a recommendation to accept a donated sculpture — and the proposal for its placement — to the Plan Commission after several residents said the work did not appropriately memorialize veterans.

At a public-comment period that spanned several speakers, George Cusick urged the council to consider longstanding memorial symbols at Memorial Park, including the U.S. flag, the POW flag and poppies, and to re-examine whether the sculpture would honor the park’s veterans. Gene Harrington told the council he had submitted a letter and said the sculpture should be reconsidered and that any additions should be historically related to Shell Lake or veteran affairs. Dawn Schrankel, citing her military service, described the sculpture as offensive and not related to the Veterans Memorial. Kent Wabrowetz asked the council to refer the matter back to the Plan Commission for reconsideration.

Councilmember Stephen Smith moved to send the Plan Commission recommendation back for review; Mike Andrews seconded the motion. "I appreciate the audience's need to be better educated, and would support the topic be referred back to the Plan Commission," Councilmember Tom Rasmussen said during discussion. The motion carried unanimously.

Why it matters: Memorial Park contains elements dating to the 1920s that residents and veterans say should be respected before new installations are approved. Returning the issue to the Plan Commission means the donated work and its proposed location will receive further deliberation and public-facing review.

The council did not adopt or reject the donation or a final placement at the meeting; instead, the Plan Commission will revisit both acceptance and location and report back to the council.