Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Text Amendment Public Participation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident-proposed Groton text amendment requiring 51% neighbor agreement opens for hearing
Summary
A resident-submitted text amendment that would require 51% of adjacent property owners within a set distance to either approve or register no opinion before a project moves forward will open for hearing on the 20th; staff noted the planning commission cannot delegate final decision-making authority to neighbors.
Get email alerts on the Text Amendment Public Participation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Agency staff notified members that a resident-submitted text amendment related to a zoning change will open for hearing on the 20th. The application builds on a previously approved amendment proposed by attorney Bill Sweeney on behalf of EG Home; the new version adds clauses the resident said would increase public participation by requiring evidence that 51% of adjacent property owners within a specified radius either favor the application or express no opinion.
A staff member explained that while the applicant proposes that 51% of neighbors must either agree or not object, the planning and zoning commission cannot legally delegate its decision-making authority to neighbors. The staff member described the proposed mechanics as requiring the applicant to present evidence that 51% of neighbors within the specified distance either support the development or have no stated objection; the staff member and others discussed how a lack of response would be treated and whether ‘no answer’ counts as no opinion.
Members asked whether there is legal precedent for such a requirement; staff said there is none and framed the proposal as a topic for discussion when the hearing opens. The agency did not take a formal position at this meeting; the item was noted for the record and will be heard by the planning commission on the designated hearing date.
Next steps: the planning commission will hear the resident-submitted amendment on the 20th; agency members may follow the planning commission hearing and provide comment through the usual public-participation channels.

