Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Trails E Bikes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council introduces ordinance to curb high‑speed electric motorbikes on trails; exceptions for mobility devices noted
Summary
City Attorney Michael Swanson asked the council to introduce an ordinance adding section 9.03 to the Klamath Falls City Code to address trail damage and safety concerns from electric motorbikes, proposing fines up to $2,000 and possible confiscation; councilors and residents emphasized enforcement limits and urged preserving access for ADA‑compliant devices.
Get email alerts on the Trails E Bikes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Klamath Falls City Council on June 15 introduced for first reading an ordinance adding section 9.03 to the city code to address use of electric motorbikes on off‑road trails.
City Attorney Michael Swanson framed the ordinance as an urgent response to increased trail damage and safety concerns. He said signage has proven ineffective and recommended an emergency clause to get the code change in effect quickly. On penalties, Swanson told the council the proposed fine "would not exceed $2,000," higher than the current limit in that code section.
Swanson also raised the possibility of allowing confiscation of unlawfully used motorbikes and described staff work with the municipal judge to design an expedited hearing process so owners could request a prompt return of seized property. He emphasized enforcement challenges on remote trails and noted that catching offenders in the act can be difficult.
Councilors and staff discussed alternatives and safeguards: the draft would explicitly except Class 1 e‑bikes, emergency vehicles, maintenance vehicles, and personal assistance mobility devices that are ADA compliant so that people with mobility needs retain access. Councilors and commenters urged a mix of education, signage and targeted enforcement rather than a blanket ban. One public commenter with experience building e‑bikes cautioned against banning e‑bikes outright and recommended distinguishing uncapped, high‑speed models from lower‑power, accessible devices.
After public comment, a councilor moved to introduce the ordinance for first reading by title only; the council approved the motion by voice vote. The item will return for subsequent readings before any enforcement mechanisms take effect.
The introduction leaves open details about final penalty levels, confiscation procedures, and enforcement resources; staff said they were collecting sample ordinances and educational materials from other communities and coordinating with the Klamath Trails Alliance on signage and outreach.

