Hamilton Shade Tree Commission reviews simple homeowner tree-removal application emphasizing one-for-one replacement

Hamilton Township Shade Tree Commission members discussed a proposed simple tree-removal application for homeowners at their March 24 meeting, citing strong public interest and a one-for-one replacement expectation.

The application, discussed under New Business, notes that removed trees must be replaced, but the transcript did not specify whether the homeowner or the township will ultimately be responsible for planting the replacement. The commission recorded that a state board of tree experts is checking that replacements take place.

Rob (staff member) was assigned follow-up tasks and noted practical tools for enforcement: he said he has four form letters that include a checkbox staff can use to indicate whether a removed tree must be replaced or may remain removed. The minutes say trees should be replaced one-for-one; if a homeowner refuses a replacement the commission may place the tree elsewhere as a last resort.

Commissioners raised questions about who controls species selection for replacements. The transcript reflects the commission’s concern that, if the town arranges replacement plantings, it could better control species choice and ensure plantings meet township standards. The minutes also note that the HOA at Evergreen is responsible for replacing trees on HOA property.

Members flagged an enforcement incident raised by a neighbor: the commission recorded that someone was selling trees the commission had planted on Facebook. Rob said he contacted the person and that they owe the township the purchase price of the trees.

The commission did not take formal action or hold a vote on the application at this meeting. The next steps recorded in the minutes were staff follow-up with template letters and continuing coordination with the state board of tree experts.