Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy And Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners raise data center and regional energy concerns after conference; urge local-first approach
Summary
A commissioner summarized takeaways from a regional energy conference and relayed an anecdote about a data center that temporarily brought an estimated 5,000 people into a rural county, prompting concern about traffic, services and local control; commissioners said communities should decide how to respond to large energy and data-center proposals.
A McCone County commissioner described lessons from a regional energy conference and warned that large data-center projects can produce rapid population shifts and lasting local impacts, saying county officials should prioritize what their communities want.
The commissioner summarized panels on diversified energy sources — solar, wind, nuclear and hydro — and mentioned the Clearwater Wind Project and speakers from neighboring counties. Relaying a judge and former commissioner’s experience with a large data-center project in another county, the commissioner said, "This county had, 5,800 people, and this they had an influx of 5,000 people when this project was built," and added that the host county still contends with traffic and accident problems tied to the development.
The anecdote was presented as a caution to local officials, not as a factual finding about McCone County itself. The commissioner said the takeaway from the conference was to "do what your communities want," framing the choice as one of local control and consideration of social impacts.
Members also discussed Montana-wide planning groups and the roles of counties in reviewing large energy and technology proposals. Commissioners noted that participants at the conference included representatives from multiple states and that some energy projects have distributed tax benefits to participating counties.
No formal decisions or votes on energy or data-center proposals were taken at the meeting; the discussion was advisory in tone and framed as a report-back from the conference. Commissioners did not cite local studies quantifying the impacts described in the anecdote; the comment was anecdotal and would require separate review or data collection to substantiate for McCone County.
The meeting moved on to other agenda items after the exchange, and the board listed follow-up operational work (sprinkler and heating-unit contacts) and scheduled the dues question for the Montana Natural Resource Coalition to be decided at the next meeting.
