Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electric Motorcycles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council holds first reading of electric‑motorcycle ordinance to clarify local rules
Summary
At first reading, staff told the council the proposed ordinance would define and restrict high‑powered electric motorcycles, prohibit operation on sidewalks and trails, require helmets and safety equipment, and provide enforcement options to address community safety concerns.
The council held a first reading of Ordinance No. 2,839 on June 22, 2026 to create a municipal code chapter addressing electric motorcycles.
City staff and the police chief told the council that high‑powered electric motorcycles and similar off‑road style vehicles are increasingly operated on public streets, sidewalks and multi‑use trails in ways that pose safety and enforcement challenges. The chief said the proposed ordinance would define "electric motorcycles" separately from e‑bikes and mopeds (based on power and speed), restrict use areas (prohibiting sidewalks, parks and multi‑use trails unless explicitly authorized) and require operator and equipment standards, including helmets and lighting consistent with state law.
The chief noted that state legislation is in motion: the transcript references a recently passed state bill that has directed the Department of Licensing to form a work group to develop state regulations, with a due date in October 2027. Staff said the city attorney reviewed the draft language to ensure it complements — and does not conflict with — state law, and recommended the council adopt the municipal code to provide local clarity for enforcement.
Enforcement and penalties described in the staff report ranged from warnings to citations, vehicle impoundment for repeat or egregious violations, and misdemeanor classifications for certain infractions. Staff said operator requirements in the draft include a valid driver's license for roadway operation and age restrictions where appropriate.
This was the ordinance's first reading; councilmembers were reminded they may offer additional comments at the second reading. No final vote or adoption occurred at the June 22 meeting.
