Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Etv Permit Transfers topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission recommends ordinance to let director approve transfers of entertainment-transportation permits

Transportation Licensing Commission (Metro Nashville) · June 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Transportation Licensing Commission voted to recommend a proposed change to Metro code (sec. 6.77) that would allow the TLC director to approve transfers of entertainment-transportation permits between existing certificate holders who are in good standing; commissioners raised concerns about concentrating authority but voted in favor to send the measure to council.

The Transportation Licensing Commission voted to recommend an ordinance change that would let the TLC director approve transfers of entertainment-transportation permits when a certificate and its permit are sold between existing certificate holders in good standing.

Director Rooker told the commission the ordinance would "allow the permit to go along with the certificate" and would apply only when a sale is between existing certificate holders; new applicants or transfers to entities without an existing certificate would still come before the commission. He said the change is intended, in part, to preserve local regulation and avoid state preemption that in the past removed local control over other industries.

The proposal would add a new section to Metro code chapter 6.77 that—if enacted by council—would let the director approve an assignment, transfer, sale or gift of a certificate and the associated permit without bringing the matter to the commission when the buyer already holds a certificate and meets the ordinance's "good standing" criteria. Metro Legal advised commissioners that the draft language uses "may be approved in writing by the MTLC director without approval of the MTLC," and warned that a binding local rule could not undercut language that grants discretionary approval to the director.

Several commissioners pushed back on vesting routine transfer authority in a single official. "I just hesitate to have one person decide all of that rather than have the commission decide all of that," a commissioner said, asking whether the ordinance could be modified to require commission review in more cases. Director Rooker and staff responded that the director's decision would be supported by a staff process—background checks, insurance verification and other checks—and that matters involving owners not in good standing or those with disciplinary histories would be brought before the commission.

Commissioners also discussed the policy rationale. Supporters said the change would give businesses greater certainty when selling a company; opponents warned it could reduce public oversight. Director Rooker said the mayor's office and NDOT support the proposal and staff expects the ordinance to be filed with council and run through the usual three readings.

Commissioner Rogers moved to recommend the draft ordinance to council; the motion was seconded and passed on a voice vote. The commission asked staff to keep members apprised through later council readings. The measure was slated for first reading on the July 7 council agenda if filed as planned.

What happens next: The commission's recommendation will be transmitted to Metro Council, where the ordinance would require council adoption to take effect. If passed, the director would be authorized to approve transfers between existing certificate holders who meet the ordinance's standards; new operators and transfers involving parties without existing certificates would continue to appear before the commission.