Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Drones topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Police asks council to fund drone replacements as prices and needs rise
Summary
Hamilton's police chief asked the council to fund replacement drones after aging units and a federal restriction on Chinese-made models drove U.S.-made drone prices up to roughly $24,000–$25,000 each; the department also discussed vehicles, handguns and overtime reimbursements tied to multiagency deployments.
The Hamilton Township Police Chief asked the council to find funding to replace part of the department's drone fleet, saying recent operations showed the remotely piloted systems are essential for public safety. The chief told councilors that Chinese-made DJI drones are no longer available for purchase under current federal restrictions, and that American-made alternatives now cost roughly $24,000 to $25,000 apiece while smaller "micro" drones run about $12,000 each.
"Our drones have really become, over the last seven or eight years or so, integral parts of the police division's operations," the chief said. "The DJI drones'were $8,000 to $9,000. The American made drones are $24,000 to $25,000 a piece." He described a recent barricaded-suspect incident in which drones provided continuous interior and exterior surveillance and said drones had helped resolve missing-person cases.
Why it matters: Councilors pressed for cost detail and trade-offs as the department balances capital requests. In the same presentation the chief described a reduced vehicle request (from $1.2 million to $750,000), a $275,000 handgun replacement request and ongoing maintenance costs; he also cited reimbursements that offset some overtime when officers serve on multiagency task forces.
The chief said police staffing is currently strong but that overtime will remain a budget pressure. "We're actually at full staffing: 174 officers," he said, adding that recent years brought unusual staffing hits (deployments, injuries and suspensions) that increased overtime in prior budgets but that some overtime is reimbursed by partner agencies for joint assignments.
Council reaction and next steps: Councilors acknowledged the operational value of drones for missing-person and surveillance work but questioned whether the requested $25,000 capital line is "fully loaded" once maintenance, docking/charging and software subscriptions are included. The chief said parts of those recurring costs are covered through existing service contracts (for example, the DroneSense program and associated data-management tools) but that hardware purchases are the immediate shortfall.
The council did not take a vote on the drone request during this session; members asked staff and the police chief to provide a detailed total-cost estimate (hardware, software, training and lifecycle replacement plan) and to identify whether old capital or grant funds could cover part of the purchase.
Provenance: Topic introduced in council questions about police capital and drone funding and was discussed in the chief's presentation and Q&A (transcript segments beginning at SEG 1019 and continuing through SEG 1599).
