Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves anti‑displacement resolution directing 90‑day framework after heated public comment
Summary
The council voted 9–1 to direct the city administrator to develop a comprehensive anti‑displacement plan within 90 days; supporters said it complements the comprehensive land use plan, while opponents called it late or duplicative.
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On June 15 the Ann Arbor City Council voted 9–1 to approve DC 4, a resolution directing the city administrator to return within 90 days with a framework to inventory existing anti‑displacement tools, identify gaps and propose a coordinated approach to help long‑term residents stay in place.
Councilmember Cynthia Harrison, sponsor of the resolution, framed the measure as complementary to the recently adopted comprehensive land use plan and said, “Growth and stability have to be designed together.” She described the resolution as directing the city to organize supports—affordable housing incentives, repair programs and other tools—into a coordinated system to identify displacement risk early and mount aligned responses.
Public comment before the vote was sharply divided. Several speakers, including John Godfrey and Ralph McKee, criticized the resolution as “too late” or “performative” given the plan’s recent adoption and said it risked being a political gesture rather than real protection. Others, including residents and advocates, urged immediate action to protect vulnerable households.
Council debate focused on sequencing and resources. Some members cautioned against piecemeal implementation that could conflict with planning commission work; staff said they will use the RFP/interview process to scope work and, if necessary, return to council for appropriation. Councilmember Ackman cast the sole no vote, citing concern about timing and duplicative work with planning efforts.
The resolution requires the city administrator to return with a framework within 90 days; staff said the report will clarify scope, resources needed and whether the comp‑plan consultant or another firm should undertake the work.

