Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ossining board reviews package of small-scale zoning changes including stairs, storage pods, parking and penalties
Summary
Trustees reviewed proposed zoning amendments to streamline stair replacement setbacks, limit portable storage pods to short-term use, narrow payment-in-lieu parking options in NC-2, tighten commercial-vehicle rules, raise zoning penalties, and clarify rules for enlarging nonconforming residential uses; most items will return for a public hearing.
The village planner led trustees through a package of proposed small-scale zoning amendments intended to streamline building processes and tighten enforcement.
Setback exemptions for stairs and landings: Staff proposed moving replacement/reconstruction of exterior stairs into a zoning exceptions section so building-department approvals can proceed without zoning-board-of-appeals review and without a 30-day administrative-notice requirement. The zoning board had pushed for a broader allowance, but the village board's earlier direction limited the change to replacement of existing stairs only.
Portable storage containers: The building department proposed permitting temporary storage pods with a maximum presence of up to 90 days within a 12-month period, and trustees discussed a prohibition on electric hookups and practical enforcement measures (staff said the building department would start the clock upon receiving complaints).
Parking revisions and front-yard parking: Amendments remove the NC-2 neighborhood-center district from payment-in-lieu-of-parking to require on-site parking or a variance in denser areas, and would restrict parking/storage of vehicles in front yards except in driveways. Trustees noted driveway-permit rules and enforcement will be important.
Commercial-vehicle limits: Planners suggested limiting commercial vehicles tied to dwelling units (discussion focused on whether to set the cap per dwelling unit or per lot, and on defining "commercial vehicle" in code to match vehicle-and-traffic provisions). Trustees favored a balanced approach to avoid displacing tenant parking while preventing landlord-run fleets in residential lots.
Penalties for violations: Staff proposed raising minimum civil penalties for zoning violations (examples discussed included a $1,000 minimum, up to $2,000 per day) to deter profit-making code violations; trustees framed changes as enforcement tools rather than revenue sources.
Nonconforming-use enlargements: The planner proposed replacing a hard-to-apply "intended use" standard with a clearer rule allowing expansion into existing interior floor area without increasing footprint or density, provided compatibility criteria are met; trustees flagged potential garage-to-bedroom conversions and emphasized preservation of required parking and building-code compliance.
Next steps: Trustees generally supported forwarding the amendments to a public hearing after staff refines language on enforceability, definitions (commercial vehicle), and neighbor-notice mechanics. No ordinance was adopted at this meeting.
