Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Certificate Of Appropriateness topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cultural Heritage Commission approves addition at 1424 Laurel Street with design conditions
Summary
The South Pasadena Cultural Heritage Commission on June 30 approved a certificate of appropriateness for an addition at 1424 Laurel Street, conditioning approval on minimum 12‑inch stepbacks between old and new construction, roofline articulation and subtle material differentiation; chair review of final changes was authorized.
The South Pasadena Cultural Heritage Commission on June 30 approved a certificate of appropriateness for a two‑story addition to a 1910 Craftsman residence at 1424 Laurel Street, subject to conditions requiring visible separation between old and new construction and chair review of final drawings.
Staff planner Tatiana Marin described the proposal (project COA26‑0003) as a 788‑square‑foot first‑floor and 789‑square‑foot second‑floor addition to an existing 2,752‑square‑foot house on a 12,460‑square‑foot lot in the Oak Laurel Historic District. Marin said the additions “will not be visible from the street” and that the proposal “substantially conforms to several design guidelines” and is recommended for approval as exempt from CEQA with attached conditions.
The project applicant’s designer said the team is matching existing materials and lowering rear ridgelines to reduce massing. Commissioners focused their questions on the rear elevation, saying the addition read as a large, “boxy” mass from side views and asking for clearer articulation to help the new work read as distinguishable from the original house. One commissioner said, “I still think it’s quite large… the massing is still quite large in the back.” Commissioner Lopez and others urged a stronger stepback and material change at the junction between old and new.
After discussion the commission agreed on a set of conditions: a minimum 12‑inch stepback where the new construction meets the original on each side, roofline articulation so the addition does not line up flush with the existing ridge, and a subtle change in siding or trim to make the historic fabric legible. The chair was authorized to review the required revisions so the applicant would not need to return for a full public hearing if the changes met the commission’s direction.
Commissioner Lopez moved to approve the project with the described adjustments; the motion was seconded and the roll call vote carried. The commission’s approval is subject to the written conditions of approval and is final unless an appeal is filed within 15 days; no construction or activity may begin during the appeal period.
The commission’s action affirms that the addition may proceed provided the applicant submits revised plans showing the stepbacks, roofline changes, and material differentiation for the chair’s review.
