Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Adus topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Queenstown Commission reviews proposed ADU zoning changes, asks whether covenants and Critical Area rules would be affected

Queenstown Commission · March 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a March 18 special meeting, the Queenstown Commission reviewed a draft accessory dwelling unit (ADU) ordinance and questioned whether state law and Critical Area rules could override private covenants and a 4‑foot setback standard; the town attorney will research the legal limits and return with a recommendation.

The Queenstown Commission reviewed proposed revisions to the town’s zoning ordinance governing accessory dwelling units during a special meeting on March 18, 2026.

President Al Hardee asked whether new state requirements could override private community covenants. Town Assistant Attorney Jen Dindinger said existing covenants must conform with any new federal, state or local laws, and that the draft ordinance includes language stating standards must still comply with current Critical Area laws.

Commissioner Jim Watzin questioned the draft’s side and rear setback standard, asking why the ordinance proposes a maximum 4‑foot setback and whether that could be changed. Dindinger said she believes the setback can be altered and committed to researching whether a 4‑foot standard is required by law.

The commission also reviewed proposed updates to the zoning ordinance’s Table of Height, Area and Bulk Requirements. Commissioners noted no changes to the table as presented; Dindinger said she will put the proposed changes into ordinance form and circulate a final draft for review.

Next steps: Dindinger will investigate the legal status of private covenants in relation to state requirements and whether the 4‑foot setback is mandated. The town will expect a revised draft ordinance for further consideration.