Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tourism Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House extends Davidson County event-marketing fee to 2032 after debate over whether it is a tax

Tennessee House of Representatives · March 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House approved Senate Bill 734 to extend a 50¢ per-night Davidson County event-marketing fee through 2032; supporters said the fee funds recruiting large visitor events, while critics said it resembles a tax. The measure passed 58–22.

The Tennessee House on the floor approved Senate Bill 7 34 on third and final consideration, extending an existing Davidson County 50¢ per-night event-marketing fee to 2032, the sponsor said. Representative Freeman, the sponsor, said the fund—created in 2008—provides dedicated revenue to recruit large visitor events and is a fee, not a tax.

The bill’s sponsor, Representative Freeman, told colleagues the fee helps bring events such as the Music City Bowl and other large-scale attractions and that the fund currently is set to sunset in 2026. "It's not a tax. It is a fee," Freeman said in floor remarks urging passage and describing Metro Finance oversight and Metro Council approval of expenditures.

Chairman Williams questioned whether the measure effectively extends a tax and asked how much money is currently in the account, expressing concern about the long-term fiscal effect. "I was just concerned that we're extending a tax — oh, a fee," Williams said, noting the fund can collect several million dollars a year and that balances may already be sizable.

Representative Vaughn asked whether the sponsor had suggested the measure would “guarantee” a Super Bowl; Freeman replied that the funding helps recruit marquee events, not that it guarantees any single outcome. The sponsor said the fund is reviewed annually by Metro Finance and that expenditures require Metro Council approval.

The House voted to approve the bill; the clerk reported the vote as Ayes 58, Nays 22. The bill will proceed as the legislative process requires for enactment.

The debate centered on characterizing the assessment as a fee versus a tax and on oversight and balances in the event-marketing account; sponsors described it as a targeted revenue stream for visitor recruiting that local government reviews annually. Next steps include whatever local and administrative steps Metro Finance and Metro Council take in administering the fund if and when the extension becomes law.