Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Enforcement Cease And Desist topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rocky Hill commission upholds cease‑and‑desist for Pratt Street property; fines to continue accruing

Rocky Hill Conservation Commission · July 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its July 8, 2026 meeting the Rocky Hill Conservation Commission upheld a cease‑and‑desist for work at 24 Pratt Street, noting citations totaling about $3,400 and a separate zoning citation bringing related liabilities to about $3,900; staff said a hearing‑officer assessment and a potential lien are next steps.

The Rocky Hill Conservation Commission voted July 8 to uphold a cease‑and‑desist order for work conducted without a permit at 24 Pratt Street, parcel ID 10‑176, after staff reported outstanding citations and ongoing enforcement steps.

Mr. Palmer, the town staff member who presented the update, told commissioners the property owner had not contacted staff and that citations include a $1,000 fine plus a separate $200‑per‑day citation. "He's currently at $3,400," Palmer said, and he added that zoning citations bring a related total to about $3,900. Palmer said the appeal periods for the citations have closed.

Palmer described the next steps as asking a hearing officer to perform an assessment without a hearing, filing that assessment with the superior court and preparing a lien on the property. He said zoning staff would likely pursue parallel enforcement and that the assessment amount ultimately depends on the hearing officer's decision. "It's going to come to light at some point," he said, noting a lien could affect closing or refinancing.

Chair called for action after discussion about whether additional $1,000 citations were warranted. One commissioner urged a holding pattern because the $200‑per‑day accrual already imposes a substantial financial pressure. The commission voted to uphold the cease‑and‑desist; the chair called for a voice vote and affirmative responses were recorded.

During public comment, Julie Raider of 611 Cedar Hollow Drive said equipment was still on the site, that buildings had encroached on her property and that wetlands impacts continued to be a concern. Raider asked how staff would pursue remedies short of court; Palmer said he would meet with the town planner and CEO early next week, provide copies of letters and citations on request, and follow up with the resident.

The commission noted that any corrective action plan required for work in the upland review area would return to the commission for review. Staff said they will update the commission under old or new business as enforcement progresses.