Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Conservation Commission denies Cascade Street group home application, citing missing information and neighbor concerns

Pittsfield Conservation Commission · January 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission voted Jan. 8 to deny Guidewire, Inc.'s Notice of Intent for a group home on Cascade Street (CO-25-01), citing missing stormwater documentation, unaddressed wetland flagging and neighborhood concerns about hydrology and property encroachment.

The Pittsfield Conservation Commission on Jan. 8 denied a Notice of Intent (CO-25-01) for construction of a proposed group home on Cascade Street after city staff and neighbors identified gaps in the filing and lingering boundary and hydrology concerns.

Ryan Nelson of R. Levesque presented the proposal, which places a driveway through the buffer zone to an isolated vegetated wetland and relies on an off-site private sewer connection. Commissioner Jonathan Lothrop questioned whether septic or sewer details were included; Nelson said the project relies on a private sewer agreement. Neighbors raised concerns about watershed impacts: resident Ned Kirchner said he was concerned about the hydrology affecting his farm, and Bella Auerbach said the project was "encroaching on their land" and referenced an adverse-possession claim and an injunction related to property lines.

City agent Shannon Poulin said she had not received a stormwater maintenance report for the lot and identified a "significant lack of information" necessary for an adequate review. Another participant, Mr. Van Der Kar, told the commission that wetland flags had been refreshed and that some flagged locations were missing from the filing.

Vice Chair Thomas Sakshaug moved to deny the application for lack of information; the motion was seconded by Commissioner Elizabeth Calebaugh and approved unanimously. The commission noted that unresolved civil matters mentioned by neighbors were not itself a legal bar for the commission but said the application lacked the technical documentation the commission requires to evaluate impacts to the wetland and watershed.