Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Licensure Denial topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Casino Control Commission denies two resubmitted casino key‑employee applications
Summary
The commission denied the applications of Francis Albano and John Brady IV after the division reported noncompliance with contested‑case procedures and outstanding documentation; motions to disqualify each applicant passed during the June meeting.
The New Jersey Casino Control Commission on June 30 denied resubmitted casino key‑employee applications for two men, Francis Albano and John Brady IV, following division recommendations that both applicants failed to comply with contested‑case procedures and did not provide required documents.
For Albano (docket 260038CK), Deputy Attorney General Jocelyn Fedowitz told the commission the division had asked for financial records, tax documents, account statements and other background materials that the applicant did not supply. After questions from commissioners, a motion to find Albano disqualified under NJSA 5:12‑80(b) and related provisions and to deny his application was made and seconded; the commission approved the motion on a voice vote.
On Brady’s resubmission (docket 260039CR), the division reported Brady failed to submit a hearing request form and did not comply with the contested‑case process after the commission remanded the matter on May 13, 2026. The division recommended denial and license revocation. The commission moved to find Brady disqualified under NJSA 5:12‑80 and related statutes, deny the resubmission, and revoke his casino key‑employee license; that motion passed on a voice vote.
Deputy Attorney General Fedowitz framed both recommendations as procedural: failure to follow the contested‑case process and failure to provide required documentation meant the division could not recommend licensure. Commissioners expressed no substantive disagreement in the record and approved the recommended outcomes.
The commission’s orders record the denials and cite the statute and regulatory provisions noted in the division’s reports.
