Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Prosecutor Referral topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission considers possible referrals after some ballots appear signed by others; legal counsel reviews statutes
Summary
Commissioners discussed whether to refer apparent cases of someone else signing ballots to law enforcement; municipal staff read criminal statutes (unsworn falsification, voter misconduct) and outlined the police/prosecutor referral process.
At the work session the commission reviewed a set of ballots that staff said appear to have been signed or cast by someone other than the registered voter and discussed whether to send those cases for law-enforcement review.
Staff reported 14 ballots coded for "ballot voted by someone other than the voter" and said those cases typically are identified during signature verification or follow-up calls when the voter reports they did not vote. "We have information related to each one of these," a staff member said, noting that staff calls and emails often elicit explanations such as family members signing for an elder or a voter who no longer lives at the address.
Commissioners asked whether there are guidelines for deciding when to refer a matter to the prosecutor's office. A staff speaker who had pulled up criminal-law provisions summarized the relevant statutes on the ballot envelope and in state code: unsworn falsification (Title 8 §3170) and voter-misconduct provisions in Title 28. "Making false statements on this envelope is punishable as a misdemeanor," the staff speaker said while reading the code and added that prosecutorial charging requires a showing of mental state — that a person knowingly made a false statement or cast another's ballot.
The staff speaker explained the common sequence: commissioners may refer suspicious ballots to the police department, which may investigate and forward a case to the prosecutor, and the prosecutor exercises discretion about charges based on evidence and intent. "Prosecutors make those decisions ... they look at the law and decide if there's a case that should be pursued," the staff speaker said.
Commissioners noted prosecutorial discretion and the possibility that accidental or well‑intentioned assistance (for example, helping an incapacitated relative vote) could result in no criminal action even if the municipal code was technically violated. The commission deferred any referral decision to the official public meeting, where they will have municipal-attorney guidance and the opportunity to make motions.
Next steps: staff will provide the commission with the relevant criminal-code references and any case summaries the commission requests to support a referral decision at the official session.
