Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Grants And Program Design topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Children's commission approves 2025 grants work-group report and agrees to update measures to include direct files

Children's Commission / Youth Justice Oversight Committee · December 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission voted to approve the statutorily required 2025 grants report guiding juvenile diversion and behavioral-health grant rounds; members requested updates to performance measures to ensure 'direct file' juvenile cases are counted where appropriate. The report will guide an upcoming January funding round.

The commission approved the 2025 grants work-group report, a statutorily required plan that frames funding for juvenile diversion, community alternatives grants and juvenile behavioral-health competitive grants.

Doug Hunsinger of the Indiana Criminal Justice Institute presented the report, which includes a new funding formula (approved previously), performance measures and process changes intended to reduce administrative burden on grantees ahead of a funding round in January. He thanked Nancy Weaver for authoring the report.

Nancy Beaker asked whether the institute's planned data collection will include juveniles who are 'direct file' matters so that recidivism and outcome measures count those cases appropriately. Hunsinger said the institute intends to collect identifiable information on program participants to enable alignment with larger datasets and agreed the working definition can be updated to include direct files if the committee wants that included.

Chair moved for approval of the report with recommended changes; a motion and a second were recorded and the committee approved the report with direction to incorporate the agreed clarifications into the performance measures and definitions.

Next steps: updates requested to the report definitions to include direct-file matters where appropriate and ongoing monitoring by the grants work group in advance of the next funding round.