Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezone 768 W Christopher topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kaysville council tables rezone request for 768 West Christopher Circle after neighborhood design concerns
Summary
The council voted to table a rezone request to change 768 West Christopher Circle from agricultural-residential to single-family R120 so the applicant can provide color renderings and more neighbor outreach; debate focused on whether attaching a prebuilt steel accessory building via a breezeway would change setbacks and neighborhood character.
Mayor Tamara Tran presided over a lengthy hearing on a rezone request for 768 West Christopher Circle that the council ultimately tabled to allow the applicant to provide additional design information and solicit neighbor feedback.
The city’s planning staff summarized the request, saying the parcel is designated single-family on the future land-use map and that the planning commission recommended approval 5–1. Staff said 49 notices were mailed and two phone inquiries and one resident visit were recorded. The applicant told the council the structure is a commercial-grade, cold-rolled steel pre-manufactured 'kit' sports court/garage and that attaching it to the house via a breezeway is the reason for the zone change request.
Why it mattered: attaching the building would change its legal setback. As staff explained, the accessory building as currently permitted is detached and allowed at the existing footprint; attaching it would convert the accessory structure to a different category that requires a zoning change and different rear-yard setbacks.
The applicant described construction delays and costs he has already incurred — including footing work and steel framing — and said he is paying storage fees while parts await assembly. He told council, “we're just asking for a breezeway that's on the backside of it that nobody can see. It's strictly for our personal use. It's not visible from the street.”
Neighbors and a former council/planning-commission member told the council the two-story steel structure could appear commercial and urged safeguards. Commenter Brett Garlick said the city and neighbors expect a cohesive small-town look and asked the council to consider a development agreement or a conditioned waiver so “as people are going by, it doesn't look like this big commercial building right in the middle of our residence.”
Council members split on next steps. Several said the building, as currently permitted detached, could still be built, and that the single question was whether to allow the breezeway attachment. Some members urged allowing the rezone now to avoid additional costs to the applicant; others said it was reasonable to see color renderings or a proposed exterior treatment before deciding.
After discussion a motion to table passed so the applicant could return with clearer renderings and staff guidance on how the council would like to document exterior commitments. The council asked staff to advise the applicant on community outreach and to bring the item back at an upcoming meeting.
