Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee weighs limits on public‑comment video after past campaign use
Summary
Finance & Administration members reviewed a 2019 practice of stopping video for off‑agenda public comment after a candidate used footage for campaign material. Councilors debated liability, a disclaimer approach used elsewhere, and agreed to circulate materials to the full council for further action.
Council member Johnson said the committee would review a past practice of turning off video for off‑agenda public comment and report back to the full council. The practice originated after campaign‑related uses of chamber footage in 2019, the mayor said, and staff provided a transcript and contemporaneous reporting for review. "At the time the council was considering this, there were actual violations," the mayor said, describing incidents in which a candidate used recorded material to create campaign videos.
Council member Holloway argued the city remains liable if it provides the facility and means that enable campaign use. "You are providing the facility and the means by which the campaign law is violated," Holloway said, urging caution about restoring continuous video for off‑agenda comments. Council member Washington noted other jurisdictions read a disclaimer before public comment and reported those cities had not experienced enforcement issues after using disclaimers.
Administration staff explained the operational approach used previously: the IT operator stops broadcasting and recording video for off‑agenda public comments but continues to record and broadcast audio, so no video file is created for those segments. "The video is never recorded in the first place," staff said, adding that audio remains part of the public record.
The mayor said the Public Disclosure Commission’s (PDC) guidance informed the earlier local discussion but that no PDC complaint was filed in the historical case because no opponent filed a complaint after the election outcome. "The PDC generally, actions they take are complaint driven," he said.
Committee members did not adopt an immediate policy change. Instead they asked administration to email the committee packet, the transcript, and related materials to all council members and to return the issue to the full council for further discussion. The chair said the committee could either recommend a change or simply report the committee’s discussion to the council for a broader decision. The administration also noted outside counsel is available to brief the council at a future meeting if the council requests legal analysis.
