Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking And Traffic topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Larkspur council to tighten high‑school area parking placards; staff to meet with neighborhood
Summary
Neighbors near Redwood High School urged council to fix enforcement gaps and counterfeit placards in the preferential parking program; council kept the program, approved item 4.3, and asked staff to meet with neighborhood representatives to explore changes and enforcement options.
Get email alerts on the Parking And Traffic topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents from the Larkspur Marina and Heather Gardens neighborhoods pressed the City Council on July 1 to address enforcement problems in the city’s preferential parking placard program, which limits on‑street parking during the school year near Redwood High School.
Thomas Atkins of Riviera Circle said many vehicles park without valid placards or with easily forged placards that obscure or omit license numbers, which makes enforcement difficult. "I support the program, but I think the placard system needs to be revised so that the automobile license is permanent and is visible to the enforcement people," Atkins said.
Other residents described frequent speeding, littering and repeat violations around predictable school arrival and dismissal times. Several speakers asked whether the city could move to stickers permanently affixed to vehicles or allow the police department to use a denser enforcement model; staff and councilors said tradeoffs existed and the program’s original design reflected neighborhood preferences.
Council action: Mayor pulled item 4.3 from the consent calendar for discussion. After public comment and staff responses the council voted to move item 4.3 (approve the staff report) and directed staff to convene neighborhood representatives and Central Marin Police representatives to explore refinements—such as more robust enforcement, possible changes to placard design and options for adjudication or private administration of citations—while preserving fairness for residents with caregivers and contractors.
Fiscal note and enforcement: Staff reported the program’s estimated gross enforcement cost is roughly $17,000 with about $13,000 in citation revenue offsetting some costs; much of the ticket revenue goes to the courts rather than directly to the city. The city manager warned that capturing more revenue would require a local adjudication process and additional administrative capacity.
Next steps: Staff will follow up with neighborhood representatives to evaluate operational changes and report back; the clerk will reach out to those who commented to facilitate follow‑up.

