Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Coastal Resiliency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chesapeake Beach planners review zoning-map updates and Coastal Resiliency recommendations
Summary
Planning staff walked commissioners through the Maryland Department of Planning guidance and the town's Coastal Resiliency Plan; commissioners made line-by-line edits to district descriptions, discussed RPC overlays and resource-conservation protections, and asked staff to draft targeted regulations for vulnerable areas using a 2.4-foot sea-level-rise baseline.
Chesapeake Beach — On June 24 the Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed the Maryland Department of Planning’s sustainable-growth implementation guide, continued a line-by-line edit of proposed district descriptions, and received a summary of Coastal Resiliency Plan recommendations that would affect zoning and development standards in mapped high-vulnerability areas.
Planning staff (Ms. Franklin) summarized eight statewide principles the town is asked to address for comprehensive-plan updates, then walked commissioners through proposed text changes for district purpose statements (RLD, RMD, RV1, RV2), recommended edits to clarify parallel structure and reduce redundancy, and a proposed approach to RPC overlays intended to preserve environmentally sensitive areas (FIDS habitat) by adding a review layer on top of base zoning.
During a lengthy discussion about the RC (Resource Conservation) and RPC overlay, staff explained that overlays add administrative review steps and can restore protections where prior decisions had removed them. Commissioners asked staff to review specific parcels in Richfield Station where overlays were altered and to prepare clearer maps (possible GIS conversion or toggled PDF layers) so the public and council can see overlays and underlying zoning more easily.
On coastal resiliency, staff summarized recommended regulatory changes: mapping areas A–C of vulnerability, requiring professional-engineer certification or raised construction techniques for development in high-risk zones, testing stormwater systems against a 2.4-foot sea-level-rise baseline, discouraging congregate critical uses (group homes, nursing homes, hospitals) in mapped flood zones, and incentivizing parking-lot retrofits and other nature-based mitigation. Staff recommended the commission break the plan’s recommendations into focused sections (high vulnerability, impervious surface, mitigation requirements) so the commission can assign regulatory language in future meetings.
Commissioners directed staff to: (1) redraft selected residential and accommodations-use sections (pages identified in the packet), (2) provide clearer overlay maps or layered PDFs for the next packet, and (3) prepare a table of recommended regulatory changes keyed to vulnerability areas (so the commission can vote on specific text at follow-up meetings). The commission tentatively discussed a fall schedule to complete the land-use package and to present recommendations to the Town Council in the fall.
Why this matters: Zoning changes tied to coastal resiliency will affect where and how development can occur in flood-prone neighborhoods and may change lot-coverage, height, and mitigation requirements for properties in mapped vulnerability zones.
What’s next: Staff will rewrite selected code language (residential and accommodations sections), prepare improved map materials, and present a prioritized list of regulatory options for vulnerability areas at a future meeting.
