Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Septic Drainage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors press health, drainage concerns as ZBA approves special permit for 71 South Street
Summary
After extended public comment about flooding, drainage and septic feasibility, the Foxborough Zoning Board approved a special permit for an addition/conversion at 71 South Street on June 25 with conditions and a proviso to consider input from the Design Review Board; the Board of Health must still approve any septic design and no certificate of occupancy will issue without that approval.
The Foxborough Zoning Board of Appeals approved a special permit June 25 for an addition at 71 South Street but did so after extended public comment focused on drainage, groundwater and septic‑system capacity.
Residents including Sandra Knight (75 South Street) and Ralph Bennett (75 South Street) testified that heavy rains have previously flooded basements in the neighborhood and expressed skepticism that a large new septic could be installed without affecting neighbors. "It's gonna affect the cesspools, the water running down and the groundwater," said a neighbor in public comment, calling for careful review.
The board repeatedly emphasized that jurisdiction over septic systems and their design rests with the town’s Board of Health. The chair reported internal communication from the health director indicating the existing house is designed for three bedrooms and that any new septic system must be engineered and approved by the health department before use: "A new septic system will have to be designed by an engineer and approved by the health department before use," the chair relayed.
After closing the public portion, the board applied its special‑permit factors (community need, traffic, utilities and neighborhood character) and concluded that the proposal did not create a substantial detriment so long as the conditions were met. The approval included three conditions similar to earlier hearings: adherence to the certified plot plan and setbacks; a cap on habitable floor area (not more than 1,700 sq ft as discussed); and exterior materials to match the existing dwelling. The chair added a proviso asking the applicant to give consideration to any architectural revisions the Design Review Board might request once that board’s authority is in effect.
Why it matters: Neighbors raised potential public‑health and drainage impacts tied to septic design and local groundwater; the board placed explicit reliance on Board of Health engineering review to control those risks before any building permit or occupancy is granted.
