Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Works topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission continues review of proposed footbridge on Center Street Greenway to Aug. 12

Groveland Conservation Commission ยท July 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Williams & Sperajes presented a proposal for a 48-foot pedestrian footbridge over a perennial stream in the Center Street Greenway; commissioners continued the item to Aug. 12 pending Natural Heritage (MESA) review and a DEP technical check (DEP file 030-0500).

Williams & Sperajes presented a proposal on July 8 for a 48-foot pedestrian footbridge to formalize a crossing of a perennial stream on the Center Street Greenway, with the stated goals of improving public safety, eliminating a makeshift stick crossing that impounds the waterway, and restoring vegetation in the riverfront area.

Justine Fox, the project representative, explained that the bridge and its six helical support piles would cross several wetland resource areas and that the design favors locating the structure on an existing, already-disturbed path to avoid additional vegetation removal. She said the design includes extra erosion controls, a seed mix for the 200-foot riverfront area, and removal of the stick bridge that currently blocks flow.

Commission questions focused on construction techniques (helical piles and precast blocks), stockpile location, access and duration. Fox estimated the on-site work would likely take a few days to about a week. The applicant reported that a DEP file number (030-0500) has been assigned and that no technical comments from MassDEP were listed yet. Commissioners noted that Natural Heritage review (MESA) is required and may take at least 30 days.

Because the MESA/technical reviews were not complete, the commission voted to continue the hearing to its Aug. 12 meeting so the applicant can return with required agency responses and any additional exhibits requested (e.g., clearer before/after impact tables).