Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council holds first readings on airport zoning and expanded commercial-use zoning amendments

Enumclaw City Council · May 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On first reading the council considered Ordinance 28-37 (smaller side-yard setbacks and 18-foot height limit abutting residential in the airport zoning district) and Ordinance 28-38 (allowing arts/vocational schools, gyms, health studios, and animal shelters with new standards); both items were presented by Senior Planner Winston Larson and recommended by the Planning Commission.

The Enumclaw City Council opened public hearings and held first readings for two zoning-related ordinances.

Senior Planner Winston Larson summarized Ordinance 28-37 as an amendment to the airport zoning district to reduce minimum side-yard setbacks from 20 feet to 10 feet and to allow a maximum structure height of 18 feet where the airport zoning district abuts a residential district. Larson said the proposal implements parts of the city's 2024 comprehensive plan and that the Planning Commission recommended approval on April 23, 2026.

Larson then described Ordinance 28-38, which proposes amendments to permit arts and vocational schools, gyms and fitness centers, health studios, and animal shelters/daycare/boarding in specified commercial and light-industrial districts and adds new standards for animal uses (requirements for inside pens/kennels, setbacks from residential zones, and waste disposal standards). Larson said findings and conclusions were provided to council as part of the staff packet and that staff recommends closing the hearing and giving first reading.

Mayor opened public comment for each hearing; no members of the public spoke and both hearings were closed without testimony. Council did not adopt either ordinance on final reading tonight; staff advised council of options to adopt as presented, reject and continue review, or modify and adopt as amended.