Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the E Motorcycles topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Enumclaw council holds first reading of ordinance to regulate electric motorcycles

Enumclaw City Council · June 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On June 22 the council held a first reading of Ordinance No. 2839 to create a new municipal code chapter defining and regulating electric motorcycles, restricting sidewalk/trail use, setting equipment and operator requirements, and authorizing enforcement; staff recommended adoption and said the measure complements state work on rules due October 2027.

The Enumclaw City Council held a first reading on June 22 of Ordinance No. 2839, which would create a new municipal code chapter to define and regulate electric motorcycles and clarify where those vehicles may be operated.

City staff said the municipal code currently lacks a clear category for high‑powered electric motorcycles and similar vehicles, which are being operated on streets, sidewalks and trails. In a staff report read by the Police Chief (S11), officials said the proposed ordinance would distinguish electric motorcycles from e‑bikes and mopeds by power output and speed capability, prohibit operation on sidewalks and multi‑use trails unless specifically authorized, require helmets and safety equipment consistent with state law, and set operator requirements such as a valid driver's license and age restrictions.

The staff report said complaints from residents and near‑miss incidents motivated the proposal and noted recent state legislation has prompted a Department of Licensing work group with an October 2027 due date for state guidance. "Without clear municipal regulations, enforcement is inconsistent and public safety risks increase," the Police Chief said in the staff presentation.

The city's attorney reviewed the proposed language to reduce conflict with state statutes, and staff recommended council adoption at later readings. This was a first reading; no final vote was taken. The mayor reminded council members that additional comments and amendments may be offered prior to second reading.