Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Road And Bridge Levy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Yankton County weighs $46 million bridge levy, considers sales-tax option under Senate Bill 96

Yankton County task force / commission meeting · July 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Task force members discussed a proposed $46,000,000 road-and-bridge levy and debated setting aside a portion of levy proceeds to build reserves; they also considered whether to support Senate Bill 96, a state sales-tax plan, and reviewed ballot timing and deadlines.

Yankton County task force members discussed a proposed road-and-bridge levy, the likely timing for putting it before voters, and broader tax-policy options tied to Senate Bill 96.

Opening remarks noted the proposed bridge levy and uncertainty over whether the item would be deferred or referred; the chair said the levy "does go into place at $46,000,000." Members discussed using a portion of any levy proceeds to build a reserve for future bridge projects rather than tapping highway operations when work arises.

One committee member argued that the county carries a high density of rural road mileage, which strengthens the case for a dedicated road-and-bridge fund. A suggestion was raised to redirect roughly a quarter to 30% of levy proceeds into a dedicated reserve so that the highway department would not need annual transfers from the general fund.

Tax-policy discussion included Senate Bill 96, a state-level sales-tax proposal presented to the commission by the Department of Revenue. A committee member described the bill as replacing a portion of the owner-occupied property-tax burden with sales tax and said many residents would likely see a net reduction in property tax under the department’s projections. Members acknowledged political opposition is likely and that counties must decide whether to opt in.

Timing questions surfaced: a committee member asked what date the commission must act to place a measure on the ballot; another noted an August 15 commission deadline and discussed the Department of Revenue’s roughly "90 day" notice requirement for making a tax effective, which shapes when such measures can appear on a November ballot.

Impact and next steps: one member noted the county’s road-and-bridge levy, if enacted, would create a recurring revenue stream that could also yield about $213,000 a year for the City of Yankton under current allocation projections. The task force asked staff to prepare projections showing how the levy would change local property-tax rankings and to provide additional data about Senate Bill 96 in advance of the next meeting.