Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Arvada approves Candelas comprehensive‑plan amendments and rezonings to add housing, with wildlife mitigation and water caveats
Summary
Council approved three comprehensive‑plan amendments and corresponding rezonings for three Candelas parcels (R24/ R13/ R6) and retained commercial at the major corner. The approvals include a requirement to address Colorado Parks and Wildlife comments at site plan and a staff condition that further applications will not proceed until adequate residential water allocations exist.
The Arvada City Council on July 7 approved three comprehensive‑plan amendments and three rezonings for three parcels in the Candelas area, changing portions of the PUD to R‑24 (up to 24 dwelling units per acre), R‑13 and R‑6 residential zoning and leaving a portion as Commercial General (CG) on the hard corner of Highway 93 and Highway 72.
Applicant land‑use counsel Carolyn White said market conditions have changed since the original PUD was adopted and that the proposal "rightsizes" commercial land while adding a range of housing types including workforce and age‑targeted units. "What we're proposing here is functionally a down‑zoning in terms of the site," White told council.
Traffic consultant Curtis Rowe told council the rezoning would generate less traffic than the full commercial/industrial entitlement the current PUD allows. "We're expecting a decrease in traffic by about 40% compared to the prior commercial scenario," Rowe said, describing planned signal improvements and turn lanes already permitted by CDOT.
Supporters—residents and local real estate professionals—said the changes respond to local demand for diverse housing types and help avoid large, hard‑to‑fill industrial buildings. "We have a shortage of affordable single‑story homes and age‑targeted homes in Northwest Arvada," realtor Nikki Castillo told council.
Opponents raised technical and environmental concerns. Speakers asked for more precise mapping and studies of the Last Chance Canal, Big Dry Creek, riparian areas and potential wetlands; they also emphasized emergency‑access and wildfire evacuation questions if higher densities are allowed near open space and Rocky Flats. Several speakers urged council to insist on stronger, enforceable commitments if workforce housing is promised.
The council approved the comprehensive‑plan amendments and rezonings on motions that included a condition tying site plan approval to addressing Colorado Parks and Wildlife comments dated June 10, 2026. Staff told council it will not process further site applications for the parcels until the city determines adequate residential water is available, and the developer publicly offered a voluntary commitment to reserve 10% of units on Parcel 1‑2 at 80% AMI (staff and council said such a commitment could be memorialized in a development agreement).
All six items (three plan amendments, three rezonings) passed unanimously. Councilmembers said they expect detailed site‑plan review to address canal relocation, wetlands delineation, wildlife corridors and wildfire‑resiliency measures before any building permits are issued.
