Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident alleges mismanagement and targeted enforcement at Cusseta‑Chattahoochee meeting; chairman denies wrongdoing
Summary
At the Nov. 12 commission meeting a resident, Warren Williams, accused county leaders of mismanagement, nepotism and targeted property assessments; Chairman Charles Coffey denied the tax‑fraud claim and said he has filed homestead on only one property. Commissioner Damon Hoyte said retaliation 'will not be tolerated.'
Warren Williams, a Cusseta resident, used the public‑comment period at the Nov. 12 meeting of the Commission of the Unified Government of Cusseta‑Chattahoochee County to allege mismanagement by county officials and to say residents have faced retaliation when they raise concerns.
"It is not about race, color, gender, it is about human decency and respect and integrity," Williams said, adding that "a dark cloud hangs over us" and that hiring of friends and family has created a toxic environment that discourages citizens from speaking up.
Commissioner Damon Hoyte thanked Williams for speaking and said the county should not tolerate retaliation. "The retaliation will not be tolerated," Hoyte said, and added that he would look into the matter. Hoyte also said some allegations would require responses from other officials.
Chairman Charles Coffey responded directly to the claims, denying an allegation of tax fraud and explaining the homestead‑exemption process. Coffey said he had applied for homestead on only one property in writing and that the county's tax assessor discovered an error on a property; he said he does not owe the county large sums and that he has no family employed by the county. "That is not true," Coffey said in reference to the tax‑fraud suggestion, and he described his service as aimed at improving the county.
The county attorney noted ongoing legal matters and said litigation related to political signs and an appeal tied to one commissioner is scheduled for Dec. 6. The commission later entered executive session for legal issues and reconvened without recording any votes.
What happened next: The commission took no immediate policy action in response to Williams' claims. Several commissioners pledged follow‑up; the meeting record shows the matter was discussed publicly and that legal counsel has been engaged where litigation is pending. Cemetery bylaws were tabled until the Dec. 3 meeting, and routine administrative items proceeded by unanimous votes.
Why it matters: Williams' comments raise questions about trust between citizens and elected officials and prompted public reassurance from at least one commissioner. The commission's decision to move into executive session on legal matters and its subsequent reconvening without public action means formal investigation steps, if any, were not reported out during this meeting.
The meeting is scheduled to resume routine business at the Dec. 3 regular meeting, where the cemetery bylaws were tabled for further consideration.
