Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transgender Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge Winthrop School Board to rescind March 4 directive on transgender policy
Summary
Multiple parents and residents asked the board to rescind a March 4 motion directing revisions to Policy JB on transgender students, warning the change could conflict with the Maine Human Rights Act, lead to litigation and cost taxpayers; the superintendent said related litigation is pending and a citizen initiative may go to the November ballot.
Public commenters pressed the Winthrop School Board on a March 4 motion that they say directs the superintendent to revise district policy on transgender students in a way that conflicts with Maine law.
Whitney Khan, a Winthrop resident and parent, told the board she had applied for the open seat and asked the board to rescind the earlier motion, saying, “Winthrop Public Schools has made commitments to every family in this district in our five core values… Our commitment to equity… includes gender identity by name.” She warned that policy changes “will be drawn into the Maine Human Rights Commission litigation already active against seven other districts,” and said individual lawsuits might not be covered by district insurance, imposing costs on taxpayers.
Kat Hoy and other residents urged the board to wait for the citizen-initiative process now headed to the November ballot. Hoy said altering Policy JB “is in direct violation of the Maine Human Rights Act and thus exposes the school district to litigation,” and called for postponement until the initiative is resolved. Bethany Drewen, speaking for the Winthrop PTO, similarly urged following legal advice to avoid unnecessary litigation costs.
Superintendent Dr. Foley updated the board that districts represented by attorney Jack Baldacci had filed a motion to dismiss on March 6 in litigation before the Maine Human Rights Commission and that the commission has 21 days from that filing to respond. He also confirmed that enough petition signatures had been collected to place the related citizen initiative on the November ballot.
Board members and the superintendent said they would add further consideration of the item to a future agenda and requested administration input before any new policy action. Chair acknowledged a process problem at the March 4 meeting and pledged to improve advance notice and transparency. Libby asked that school administration be part of future deliberations because they implement policies daily.
The board did not take formal action to rescind or change Policy JB during the meeting; public commenters and several board members recommended postponing further action until legal developments and the citizen initiative are resolved.
