Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget And Millage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Laurens 55 reviews budget scenarios that would either cut six positions or raise millage
Summary
Finance staff presented two budget scenarios: a no-millage plan that would remove six general-fund positions through attrition, and a 4.4-millage option that would retain the positions; the board heard details on mandated teacher pay increases and asked for follow-up cost estimates for administrative pay adjustments.
Get email alerts on the Budget And Millage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a board meeting that followed an earlier budget workshop, the Laurens County School District 55 finance director reviewed two budget scenarios for the coming fiscal year: one with no millage increase that would remove six positions from the general fund (through attrition), and another that included a 4.4-millage increase that would retain those positions.
Miss Leanne London, the districtCFO, outlined the revenue assumptions and expenditure changes for both scenarios. She said the budget includes a state-mandated $2,000 per-cell increase for the teacher salary schedule that will cost the district roughly $898,186, plus step and percentage adjustments for non-teaching staff. Under the no-millage scenario the district would aim to realize savings by not filling up to six positions; under the 4.4-millage scenario the district would keep those positions funded.
London also noted that district revenues and expenditures reflect timing fluctuations: the treasurer's office balance at the end of April was reported near $10.36 million, and the district had received about 87% of budgeted revenues year to date. She flagged that invoices for school resource officers totaling around $500,000 were received in May and would affect expenditures for the fiscal year.
Board members asked for precise dollar figures for administrative pay options (for example, applying a 2% increase at the school level for principals and assistant principals) and requested staff provide a follow-up breakdown showing the cost impact of different administrative and school-level pay choices.
No formal vote was taken on a budget at this meeting; board members asked staff to return with the requested cost details so the board could make a final decision.

