Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Shelter topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carter County commission orders contract talks and approves conditional increase for animal shelter funding
Summary
After months of debate, the Carter County Commission voted to have mayors and attorneys renegotiate the shelter contract and approved a $20,000 county increase (to $270,000) contingent on a $25,000 city contribution; commissioners and residents also discussed whether converting the shelter to a 501(c)(3) will be viable.
The Carter County Commission on Aug. 23 voted to send county and city mayors and attorneys to renegotiate the contract governing the county Animal Shelter and later approved a $20,000 increase in county funding contingent on a $25,000 city contribution.
The renegotiation motion, made by Randall Jenkins and seconded by Austin Jaynes, passed by roll call (Yes: 20, No: 2, Absent: 1). Commissioner Aaron Frazier had presented several years of budget history and a five-year projection showing increases from a 2017 budget of $296,428.82 to a 2021/22 proposed figure of $492,603.88, and he urged a formal three-party contract that would define county, city and nonprofit roles.
Kurt Alexander, mayor of Elizabethton, urged the county to raise its contribution from $250,000 to $270,000, citing 1,336 animal-involved 911 calls last year (876 county; 460 city) and asking for a roughly 65% county / 35% city split. The commission later approved an additional $20,000 from the county contingent on the city adding $25,000; the suspension-of-rules vote to consider the motion passed 19–2 and the funding motion passed 21–1.
Residents and shelter supporters made multiple public comments urging full funding and operational support. Lisa Padgett and Tim Vines each said the shelter needs to be fully funded and staffed and urged that unspent savings be returned to the shelter. Mike Simerly urged continued county-city cooperation. Shelter Director Shannon Posada was thanked by the commission for her work.
Some speakers cautioned about a rapid conversion to nonprofit status. Mary Harvey advised staged planning, a revised contract, and clearer fundraising and governance steps before converting to a 501(c)(3); Wanda Ottey warned that donations alone would likely be insufficient and said supporters were not calling for closure of the shelter but were concerned about sustainability.
The commission also accepted a $1,515 monetary donation to the Animal Shelter during the meeting.
What happens next: the mayors and attorneys are to meet with the shelter director to renegotiate the contract; the additional county funds are contingent on the city contribution and are not unconditional appropriations.
