Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety Technology topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Burlington council approves cloud-based camera system for Urban Service vehicles

Burlington City Council · July 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council approved a cloud-based camera system for 14 Burlington Urban Service vehicles, citing time savings and remote access to footage. The one-time additional cost was cited at about $17,000 with an annual recurring software/cellular fee of $6,800; council asked about price locks and operational impacts.

Burlington — The City Council voted to approve a resolution to purchase a cloud-based camera system for 14 Burlington Urban Service vehicles, replacing older, hard-drive-based systems and allowing staff to view live feeds and retrieve footage remotely.

Nick McGregor, deputy city manager/public works (speaking as the presenting staff), said the existing four older systems require staff to remove hard drives or SD cards and bring vehicles into a bay to access footage. “With this cloud based system, I or other staff are able to view live feed of the camera service and are able to pull video, just from the web,” McGregor said, arguing the change would save staff time and reduce the risk of damage or reinstall errors when handling drives.

McGregor told council the one-time cost differential between like-for-like replacement and the cloud solution was about $17,000. He said there also would be an annual recurring fee for cellular service and software licenses, currently estimated at $6,800 per year. A council member asked whether that $6,800 price would be locked; McGregor responded that “there’s no price lock on that” and that the city would need to discuss increases with the vendor if they occur. On how often staff currently pull footage, McGregor said incidents this past school year required footage retrieval multiple times per week, calling the current process a “major time zap.”

Councilors voted in favor of the resolution. Supporters cited operational efficiency and improved evidence access; no formal privacy policy discussion or amendments appeared in the meeting record.

The contract authorization directs staff to complete procurement steps and proceed with system installation for the 14 vehicles named in the memo. The council did not specify a vendor name in the discussion transcript.

What's next: Staff will proceed with the purchase and implementation process under the terms approved by the council. Councilors signaled they expect future updates if recurring costs change or privacy/operational concerns arise.