Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation Revenue Sharing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Findlay staff pitches half-mile annexation buffer, township revenue-sharing options and countywide water-service model
Summary
City staff proposed a half-mile buffer requiring annexation agreements for properties nearest Findlay, new revenue-sharing options for townships (including a draft CEDA/CETA model and a discussed 2-mill increase) and a water-services agreement to sell bulk or full-metered service to villages and townships; members asked for finance and stakeholder review.
City of Findlay staff presented a package of related proposals to the economic-development committee that would change how the city and neighboring townships handle annexations, revenue sharing and outside water service.
On annexation and revenue sharing, staff walked through the statutory baseline in the Ohio Revised Code and proposed a half-mile buffer from the current corporation limits: properties within that buffer would be required to sign annexation agreements to access city utilities; properties outside the buffer would retain the option to connect without forced annexation. Staff said the model would preserve developable land near existing infrastructure while giving townships options if they prefer not to be annexed.
Staff said it has discussed the draft concept with Allen Township and plans to take the model to Liberty and Marion township trustees; one draft term discussed would increase township millage shares (staff referenced a draft line-item suggesting about 2 mills) and offer townships the option to continue receiving their current revenue amount during an abatement period rather than waiting until abatements expire.
On water services, staff presented a simplified comprehensive-water-services agreement offering either bulk master-meter sales (villages retain local maintenance) or full integration into the city system at a different rate. Van Buren’s arrangement was cited as a working example: fees can be set by ERU (equivalent residential unit) or linear feet of frontage to recover construction costs and loan repayments. Jeremy, a water staff member, explained billing and repayment mechanics and said the plant’s current daily load (~6,000,000 gallons) has room to grow — staff said the plant could operate at roughly 12,000,000 gallons a day easily and, for limited periods, produce up to 16,000,000 gallons.
Committee members asked about safeguards to avoid overuse; staff proposed contract caps (maximum daily loads), ERU calculations and renegotiation triggers if usage exceeds agreed amounts. Staff also noted EPA pressure on small systems as part of the rationale for regionalized service options and said some smaller communities are actively seeking alternatives.
The committee recommended staff continue stakeholder review and bring the draft agreements to the finance committee for a deeper financial vetting. Members asked staff to return with clarified draft language, CETA/CEDA terms and modeled pro-formas for the proposed millage adjustments and service fees.
Sources: Committee discussion and staff presentation during the Findlay City Economic Development Committee meeting. Committee directed staff to pursue stakeholder review and bring drafts to the finance committee.
