Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Care Exemptions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Montgomery delegation advances child-care exemptions to WSSC development charge with added reporting
Summary
The Montgomery County Delegation reported MCPG107-25 favorably after adopting a county-executive amendment that extends reporting on exemptions to the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission system development charge; members debated replacing first-come, first-served allocation but withdrew proposed changes after clarifying fund reserves.
A Montgomery County Delegation committee on economic development voted to report MCPG107-25 favorably after adopting an amendment from the county executive that extends the county’s reporting requirement for exemptions to the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (WSSC) system development charge.
Chair (committee chair) opened debate on MCPG107-25, saying the bill would make certain exemptions mandatory rather than discretionary for the Montgomery County Council and would authorize persons who are not property owners to apply for exemptions to help child-care centers. The chair said the county executive supports the bill with an amendment and urged the committee to move the measure so it can proceed to Prince George’s County consideration.
Delegate Williams moved the bill for purposes of amendment; after discussion the chair moved the county-executive amendment, which was seconded and adopted by voice vote. The amendment extends the reporting requirement so the county must include exemptions from the WSSC system development charge in its reports and clarifies the language applies to Montgomery County.
During amendment debate Delegate Kaiser urged replacing a 1st-come, 1st-served allocation with a different policy once a high-usage threshold is reached, arguing first-come rules advantage applicants who have better information and resources. Delegate Moon, sponsor of the bill, explained the program’s mechanics and funding: roughly $500,000 is allocated each year and is applied to eligible applicants as they apply; he said there is also a roughly $6,000,000 rollover balance from prior years and that fully depleting the funds within the three-year refund window would be “highly unlikely.” After hearing those details, Delegate Kaiser withdrew her amendment.
With the single county-executive amendment adopted, the committee moved and seconded approval of the bill as amended; by voice the delegation reported MCPG107-25 favorably and advanced it from the committee.
What’s next: MCPG107-25 will proceed from the delegation with a favorable report and may receive additional consideration in subsequent committees; the bill’s reporting amendment requires the county to include WSSC exemption data in future reports to the delegation.
