Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Resolutions And Routine Approvals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hopatcong planning board approves four property resolutions and routine bills

Hopatcong Planning Board · July 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its June 17 meeting the Hopatcong Planning Board read and approved four property resolutions (with hearings scheduled) and voted to pay municipal bills; actions were routine and recorded by roll call. Several small property items were discussed but require later filings.

The Hopatcong Planning Board on June 17 read four property resolutions and approved them by motion and roll-call assent, and the board moved to pay municipal bills.

The board announced resolutions for Cairo Redzik (Severns Pickle Point Road), Richard and Juanita Braunstein (Oakdale Avenue), Cameron Poole (211 Lakeside Boulevard) and Brian Wisdom and Verona Mohajovic (307 Lakeside Boulevard). Each resolution included a hearing date (for example, the Redzik and Braunstein hearings were scheduled for June 17, 2025) and, after a motion and second, members recorded affirmative responses during roll call indicating approval of the board’s actions.

Chair and board members also moved to pay outstanding municipal bills; that motion was seconded and approved by voice/roll call.

Several minor property matters were discussed but not decided. Board members described a small covered entry at 304 Lakeside Avenue as technically triggering variance rules because it involves structural work; the board advised the applicant to obtain any required approvals rather than assume the change is de minimis. Members similarly discussed a dock and seawall issue at 17 Lakeland Drive, noting the existing dock encroaches across a property line and that replacement could trigger side-yard or coverage variances.

The board emphasized procedural steps for applicants: applications for expansions must be filed and noticed so neighbors and the public may review them. No final decisions on expansions or enforcement were recorded in the excerpt beyond the board’s direction to follow the normal municipal application and variance process.