Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Corrales council confirms three planning-and‑zoning appointees after questions about enforcing ordinances vs. the comprehensive plan
Summary
The council approved Ed Bowles, Michael Sors and Salome Roy to the Planning & Zoning Commission after debating applicants’ references to enforcing the comprehensive plan (advisory) rather than existing ordinances (law). One appointment (Larry Acevedo) was postponed so councilors could question him in person.
The Village of Corrales governing body approved three nominees to its Planning & Zoning Commission and postponed a fourth after an extended discussion about the commission’s role in applying ordinances versus promoting the village’s comprehensive plan.
Mayor (speaker 3) introduced the slate of candidates. Councilors expressed concern that several applicants’ written materials said they would “enforce the comprehensive plan.” Councilor Burket and others noted the comprehensive plan is advisory and not legally enforceable; they repeatedly urged appointees to apply existing ordinances and to make recommendations for ordinance changes through the proper channels.
Councilors postponed the appointment of Larry Acevedo so members could meet him in person. The council then approved Ed Bowles after Bowles pledged to recuse himself from decisions where he might face a conflict—particularly if an ad hoc architect-selection group later brought recommendations to the commission. Michael Sors and Salome Roy were also approved after Q&A about prior service, neighborhood concerns and willingness to undergo training.
Planning staff said new‑commissioner training is scheduled for July 15 with a retired Albuquerque planning director. Councilors urged appointees to cite ordinance numbers when making recommendations—both to aid attorneys in the event of appeals and to provide clear legal footing for future actions.
The council left open several follow-up items, including confirming whether particular ad hoc committees might create conflicts of interest and ensuring new commissioners receive orientation on the distinction between advisory guidance and code enforcement.
