Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Issues topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge council to act on housing access and call out Oakland DIY skate park
Summary
During public comment, residents asked the council to restore or create home‑ownership assistance for Pittsburgh residents, raised persistent problems with bus service and neighborhood maintenance in Panther Hollow, and urged action on an unauthorized Oakland DIY skate park alleged to have vandalism and public‑safety impacts.
Get email alerts on the Community Issues topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Several Pittsburgh residents used the council’s public‑comment period on July 7 to press for tangible city action on housing, transit and a contested DIY skate park in Oakland.
Unique Brown, who identified herself as a lifelong Pittsburgh resident, told the council she had lost promised housing vouchers and that remaining programs route residents to substandard rentals. "So I'm asking you, what's the plan? Can we create a home ownership program for Pittsburgh?" she asked, saying past one‑time assistance (she referenced a $90,000 program) had not been replaced.
Carlino Gianpalo of Panther Hollow described repeated neighborhood impacts from what he called the illegal Oakland DIY skate park, citing early‑morning noise, numerous police reports and "vulgar graffiti encouraging underage drinking and recreational drug use." He directly urged Mayor Corey O'Connor to close the site and asked the council to report alleged code‑of‑conduct breaches involving two named members to proper authorities.
Other commenters raised related concerns. Yvonne F. Brown described lost bus service and disruption for older residents near skateboard activity; George Karpax asked the city to invest more in neglected park and step infrastructure in Panther Hollow; Bethany Cameron of informup.org presented a reader survey showing broad support for continuing Safe Passages funding even without school‑district contributions and strong reader support for additional accessible vehicles for the Office of Community Health and Safety.
Council did not respond with policy commitments during the public‑comment period; many items raised by speakers centred on requests for future programs, enforcement or restoration of previously offered supports. Several of the speakers' requests — a permanent Pittsburgh‑resident homeownership program, closer attention to Panther Hollow maintenance, and enforcement or removal of the Oakland DIY skate park — would require follow‑up by relevant city departments if council chooses to act.

