Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Surveillance Privacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges council to ban Flock cameras, citing privacy and security risks
Summary
Thomas Wimberley told the council he opposes Flock (ALPR) cameras in Summerville, citing Department of Homeland Security reports, cybersecurity concerns, potential resale of data and Fourth Amendment implications; the item was raised during public comment with no council action recorded.
During public comment on July 9, Thomas Wimberley asked the Town Council to prohibit Flock automated license-plate reader cameras in Summerville, arguing they pose privacy and cybersecurity risks and could be used by insurers or other commercial entities.
Wimberley told the council the Department of Homeland Security has identified dozens of possible security issues associated with the technology and said the network of cameras nationwide could be used to build movement profiles. "There are no laws on the book saying Flock can't sell this information to insurance companies to increase your premiums," he said, and added that cybersecurity experts call the system "extremely easy to hack."
Wimberley framed his remarks as a plea for the privacy of future generations and asked the council to "please look into this issue heavily." The council took no formal action on the matter during the meeting; it was recorded as public comment only.
The transcript contains claims about DHS advisories and system vulnerabilities; these claims were made by a resident and were not validated or disputed in the meeting record. Any formal policy or ordinance addressing ALPRs would require further staff research and a council agenda item.
