Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wind Energy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Albany County renews Railtie wind project permit amid hours of public comment

Albany County Board of County Commissioners · June 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After an extensive applicant presentation and more than two hours of public comment both for and against, the Albany County Board of County Commissioners voted to renew the Railtie (Rail Tie) wind energy WEX permit for five years, setting a new expiration of July 13, 2031.

Albany County commissioners voted to renew a five-year extension of the Railtie wind energy WEX permit on a motion that incorporated staff findings and the applicant’s responses, extending the permit to July 13, 2031. The decision followed a multi-hour presentation by the developer and more than two hours of public comment from both supporters and opponents.

Staff recommended renewal after reviewing the applicant’s submittal, which included evidence of construction activity and continuing project viability. Planning staff described work the applicant said had been completed: driveway entrances and approximately 2.5 miles of access roads; excavation of foundations for 10 turbines; road improvements; stormwater control measures and a 2‑acre staging area. The staff memo recommended renewal under county standards that allow extension if either substantial commencement or acceptable evidence of continued viability is shown.

Kelly Pearson, the applicant’s attorney, introduced the project team and framed the request as an update to the permit schedule. Charlie Behnke, the project lead, said the company remains “committed to completing the project” and described steps taken to keep permits, studies and mitigation plans current. Behnke said the company has updated an acoustic analysis and aircraft detection lighting submissions to the FAA, signed a road‑use agreement that included a $1 million letter of credit and placed additional bonding and security tied to federal interconnection agreements. “This project remains economically feasible and viable,” Behnke said.

The applicant and its representatives repeatedly cited ongoing federal litigation over interconnection with the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) as the primary reason construction paused after work started late in 2024. The company asked the county to recognize the delays as litigation‑driven and to grant additional time to resolve those matters.

Opponents challenged both the factual basis for a renewal and the wisdom of extending a 2021 permit into 2031. Mark Stewart, representing Monahan Farms, argued the commission should not treat the project as substantially commenced: “Five miles out of 60 is 8.3%,” Stewart said, criticizing the staff analysis for not quantifying percent complete and arguing that the minimal work completed does not meet the regulatory standard for substantial commencement.

Other public commenters raised environmental, cultural and community concerns. Several speakers asked the board to require a fresh permitting review rather than extending a prior approval, citing ongoing federal litigation, the need for updated groundwater and wildlife studies, and cumulative regional development since 2021. Supporters including local contractors and ranching families emphasized anticipated economic benefits: jobs, lease payments and increased tax revenue that, in the applicant’s socioeconomic update, the company estimated would produce tens of millions in sales and use taxes during construction and millions annually in property taxes over the project’s life.

Chair (speaker 3) then called the motion to renew, reading the staff findings and the applicant’s June 4 and June 11 letters into the record as part of the motion. The board voted to renew the WEX permit for five years. The motion was announced as carried; the formal tally was not recorded verbatim in the transcript beyond the chair’s announcement that the motion carried.

Next steps noted by the applicant included quarterly updates to the commission on construction schedule, permit compliance and an annual socioeconomic update. Several members of the public urged the board to track future compliance closely and to require updated studies if construction resumes.

The renewal does not resolve ongoing federal litigation, which the applicant and opponents said remains active and could affect the project timeline.