Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Device Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Work session revisits cell-phone and personal-device rules; enforcement and equity concerns remain

Portsmouth Boards & Commissions · July 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board reviewers debated restoring a broader list of banned devices, enforcement mechanisms, and curriculum impacts for courses that use student devices; they agreed to bring redlined language and admin input to the next meeting.

Committee members reopened discussion of the personal-device (cell phone) policy and whether to restore a more expansive device list — cell phones, tablets, laptops and wearables — or keep narrower language limited to cell phones and smartwatches.

Committee member (S3) and others said some high-school courses, including yearbook and photo classes, had depended on student devices; staff noted Chromebooks sometimes lack the performance or features for advanced coursework. "The Chromebooks are clunky," one member said while describing limitations for high-level classes, and members urged the committee to consider curricular impacts if laptops or tablets were prohibited.

Members debated enforcement logistics (collection pouches, locked storage, staff burden) and equity (ensuring students have access to school-issued technology for classwork). Some favored a clearer, simpler ban — for example, requiring students to deposit devices on entry — while others worried about creating large end-of-day bottlenecks or overburdening principals. Committee member (S3) described prior implementations that used pouches and said schools that invested in pouches reported better compliance.

The group agreed to continue drafting the device policy, solicit input from building administrators on enforcement and consequences, and to preload the board packet with redlines and an admin memo so the full board could consider proposed enforcement language at the next meeting. The work session ended with the Chair adjourning the meeting.