Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Height topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Needham planners propose side‑wall plate limit and clerestory cap to curb 'three‑story' side walls
Summary
The Needham Planning Board reviewed diagrams proposing a 21.5‑foot cap to the top of side‑wall plates and a 26‑foot limit on flat‑roof clerestories while preserving existing 35/41‑foot overall ridge height limits; builders invited to comment generally endorsed the approach as targeting outliers, not widespread change.
The Needham Planning Board on July 7 reviewed draft zoning measures aimed at limiting overly tall side walls on single‑family homes in the SRB district and setting a separate cap for raised flat‑roof clerestory areas.
Oscar, the board presenter, explained the side‑wall proposal would measure two full floors from the top of the foundation to the top of the wall plate and cap that dimension at 21.5 feet. He said the change is intended "to avoid having that be a 3‑story wall," while keeping the town's current overall height allowances — 35 feet measured from average grade and 41 feet measured from the lowest point on very sloped lots.
Local builders Paul McGovern and Gary Losanto, invited to advise the board, said the modern flat‑roof style represents a small share of recent builds (they estimated roughly 5–10%), but that those homes can be visually prominent. Both said the proposed 21.5‑foot side‑plate limit and a separate 26‑foot cap for upper flat roofs would address outliers without broadly preventing common designs. "I think all around it's fair," Paul McGovern said, and Gary Losanto described the approach as "a great bylaw all around when it comes to height." (Speakers' names and roles come from the transcript introductions and self‑identifications.)
Board members clarified measurement rules — whether heights are taken from average grade or the lower of existing/finished grade — and discussed why the town has both a 35‑ and a 41‑foot measurement (the 41‑foot provision was added after a problematic example of an exposed multiple‑story build). Several members emphasized the need to translate the diagrams into precise zoning text and definitions so the measurements are enforceable.
The board directed Oscar and staff to work with counsel to draft red‑lined zoning language and agreed to advance the concept into bylaw form for later review. The board emphasized this is not a proposal to raise the townwide height limit, but to narrow an implementation detail so builders cannot produce vertical three‑story side walls that appear overbearing.
The board said it will present the draft language at a future meeting and then open it to public hearing before any vote.
