Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environmental Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Community groups present data tying dairies to nitrate-contaminated wells and press board for faster, enforceable timelines
Summary
Environmental-justice organizations and community leaders presented geospatial and well-testing analyses showing higher nitrate levels in neighborhoods with dairies and called for accelerated milestones, expanded monitoring (including vadose-zone sampling), and stronger alternative drinking-water remedies tied to SAFER and CV Salts.
Get email alerts on the Environmental Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Community leaders and environmental-justice advocates told the State Water Resources Control Board July 8 that the revised dairy order must do more to protect drinking water for disadvantaged and Latino/Latina communities in the Central Valley.
Angelica Rodriguez, staff attorney with California Rural Legal Assistance, and geospatial analyst Jake D'Alessandro presented statistical findings showing stark disparities: census tracts with very high proportions of Latino/Latina residents had much higher average nitrate concentrations in domestic wells (transcript examples: neighborhoods north of Modesto/Turlock). D'Alessandro said domestic wells within two miles of confined-animal feeding operations had roughly double the risk of testing above the 10 mg/L maximum contaminant level compared with more distant wells and that neighborhood-level presence of a dairy increased the odds of unsafe wells by a factor of about 9.4 in his analysis.
Advocates urged tighter interim numeric land-application limits, rotation and expansion of the Central Valley Dairy Representative Monitoring Program's representative-well network, and incorporation of vadose-zone monitoring to predict and manage nitrate leaching. They requested that alternative drinking-water requirements include both interim and long-term solutions (not just bottled water and temporary measures), and suggested allowing dischargers to make in-lieu contributions to the State Board's Safe and Affordable Drinking Water (SAFER) Fund to speed durable solutions.
Observers asked the State Board to require clearer, enforceable milestones and public progress reports; several speakers asked the board to apply environmental justice (AB-related) findings explicitly in final WDRs and to ensure the regional board's plans do not leave communities waiting for safe tap water. The panel urged the State Board to retain authority to act if regional deadlines slip and to consider backstops that bring all dairies into compliance if management-zone or regional processes do not advance quickly enough.
The State Board acknowledged these concerns and staff indicated the revised draft adds preliminary AB-related findings and commitments to coordinate with existing CV Salts and SAFER programs, while asking commenters to submit written proposals before the July 30 deadline.

