Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee recommends moving Barclay ground‑lease to commission after developer presentation
Summary
Committee reviewed terms of a proposed long‑term ground lease for the city‑owned Barclay parcel at 1940 Park Avenue: 99‑year framework (51‑year initial term), a $2,000,000 upfront payment, developer assumption of development costs, and affordability covenants covering roughly 22% of 105 units. Commissioners pressed for stronger failure‑to‑perform protections, liquidation damages, and clarity on covenant in lieu proposals before final approval.
Administration and the developer presented material lease terms for a proposed long‑term ground lease to redevelop the city‑owned Barclay parcel at 1940 Park Avenue. Steven David and Fred Gonzalez described the package: an upfront payment of $2,000,000 to the city, developer assumption of design, financing, permitting and construction costs with no city subsidy, and public‑benefit commitments that would reserve approximately 22% of the project—05 units for restricted rents, including seven senior units.
Why it matters: The parcel has been fenced and inactive for over a decade and commissioners said the city needs protection that the developer will meet outside dates and not leave the project incomplete. Staff described a 2029 construction‑finish target; the developer said entitlements and financing were in active progress and that construction could follow entitlements on a roughly 18‑month timeline.
Key protections and concerns: City legal staff described outside dates, liquidated damages for a 365‑day period following certain missed milestones, and termination rights if the developer fails to cure. Commissioners focused on whether the developer sked covenant in lieu of unity of title would permanently tie city land and whether there are alternative ways to transfer needed development rights without creating a permanent encumbrance. Staff said the covenant would not be permanent if no FAR transfer consummates; if development rights are transferred, the unified development site could become permanent.
Committee action: After discussion of timing, scope of public benefits, parking concessions and termination language, the committee voted to return the item to the full commission with a favorable recommendation to advance the proposed ground lease and continue to refine outstanding protections and CIP details prior to final readings.
Next steps: Staff and the development team will finalize outstanding terms, address title/covenant language, clarify milestone and termination language, and present the item to the commission for final consideration in September.
