Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Rights And Stormwater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ditch shareholders press council for clarity after court ruling; special stakeholder meeting set
Summary
After a January court ruling assigning lateral maintenance to shareholders, ditch companies told the council on July 6 that the city must clarify whether its code remains enforceable. Council agreed to a stakeholder meeting July 20 to review staff and legal analyses before moving to any executive session.
Representatives of Fremont County ditch companies urged the Cañon City Council on July 6 to provide immediate clarity after a court ruling earlier this year clarified lateral maintenance responsibilities. Ray Lipas and other ditch‑company leaders said the January decision shifts maintenance duties to shareholders and leaves property owners and ditch users uncertain about the city’s ordinance and enforcement.
"This ruling was done in January," said Lipas. "Now it's July, and we even want to go into an executive session to take care of something that's already been judged on. I'm confused." Ditch representatives said they needed a clear public position so lateral owners know whether to act to repair culverts and cleanouts.
City staff and council members acknowledged the confusion and the legal complexity. City attorney Sellers and staff confirmed they had prepared a legal memo that analyzes three issues related to the ruling and its interaction with city code; Sellers noted that legal analyses to the council are privileged attorney‑client communications unless the council waives that privilege. Multiple council members said stakeholders’ technical expertise is essential to producing workable policy and that an open forum to hear ditch companies before any closed discussion would be appropriate.
The council scheduled a special meeting for Monday, July 20 at 4:00 p.m. to convene affected stakeholders, hear their concerns and determine what, if any, privileged legal discussion is needed afterward. Council members who are themselves ditch‑board members were warned by the city attorney that they potentially face conflicts of interest and may need to recuse themselves from some votes.
What’s next: Staff will circulate the attorney memo to council; the July 20 session will let stakeholders present technical and operational constraints. The council may then decide whether to hold a follow‑up executive session to obtain privileged legal advice and to consider policy options.
