Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Harrison planners present updated future land‑use map; residents warn of traffic and wetlands risks
Summary
SRF Consulting and village staff reviewed a revised comprehensive plan map after outreach that drew 74 attendees and 106 survey responses; residents at the meeting urged changes over traffic entrances, wetland protection and stormwater management for a proposed North Shore subdivision. The board will publish the draft for a 30‑day public comment period ahead of a June adoption step.
A joint meeting of the Village Board and Planning Commission reviewed a draft update to Harrison's comprehensive plan and future land‑use map on May 20, as SRF Consulting summarized public engagement and recommended map edits.
"Like Chad said, my name is Mitch Brousse. I am a planner with SRF Consulting Group," Mitch Brousse told the meeting, describing the outreach: 74 people attended an open house in March and the team received 106 written or online survey responses. Brousse said the most common themes were opposition to medium‑ and higher‑density housing in some areas, support for agricultural preservation and a mix of views on commercial or industrial growth.
Residents who spoke during public comment said they remain concerned about specific impacts of planned development. Scott Schwartz, who lives in North Shore Estates, told the board staggered drive entrances planned for the proposed subdivision on North Shore Road are "a recipe for the accidents," urged routing more traffic to Old Highway Road and asked whether the developer would be responsible for repairing roads damaged by construction equipment. Brooke Rock, who said her property abuts the proposal, said Lot 63 appears to encroach on wetlands and asked who will be responsible for runoff and its effect on adjacent yards.
Consultant recommendations presented several map changes that respond to public feedback: shrinking some medium‑density designations in the western portion of the village and converting them to low‑density residential, keeping some parcels as mixed use to preserve flexibility near State Park Road and Highway 10, and identifying transitional service areas where sewer and water may be extended in the future. Brousse said transitional areas are intended to be phased so developers can connect to public utilities once service is available.
The presentation included an acreage breakdown: roughly 57.5% of village acres remain designated agricultural, about 15% low‑density residential, just under 5.5% parks and recreation, about 5% commercial, approximately 4.1% medium‑density residential and under 1% high‑density. Brousse also said the state Department of Administration projections that will be included in the plan estimate Harrison could reach about 21,000 people by 2050; he emphasized the land‑use map can either constrain or enable that growth depending on future policy choices.
Commissioners pressed for clearer goals on growth and infrastructure. Several members asked how the map will help prioritize road, sewer and park investments; staff and the consultant said policies requiring developers to provide parkland or fees in lieu and attention to sewer service areas are meant to guide where public investment and higher density are appropriate. The consultant also noted that wetland permitting through the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources is required before building on affected parcels.
The joint bodies agreed to publish the revised draft and open a 30‑day public comment period; staff said the June meeting will present a near‑final draft for preliminary approval prior to formal adoption following the comment period.
