Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Space Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Morgantown council adopts resolution restricting 'hostile architecture' after bench design debate
Summary
Council voted 5–2 to adopt a resolution discouraging installation of 'hostile architecture' in public infrastructure; supporters said it would improve accessibility, opponents warned some bench designs assist older and mobility‑impaired residents.
The Morgantown City Council on July 7 adopted a resolution directing the city to discourage future installation of features sometimes labeled "hostile architecture" — design elements intended to deter use of public spaces such as segmented benches or spikes — and to inventory existing public seating for possible modification.
Council discussion and public comment underscored sharply different views. Downtown resident Paige Rearing told the council: "I am here in support of banning the hostile architecture throughout Morgantown," arguing that removing deterrent features would make downtown more accessible for people with disabilities, parents and visitors. Another supporter, Harrison York, said the change would make downtown spaces "more livable."
Opponents said some bench designs with center armrests or segmented surfaces help older residents stand up and are important for people with mobility limitations. Mary Ann Folse told council: "These benches with armrests in the middle are the only way I'd be able to sit and get up 6 months ago... I am urging you to drop this nonsense, vote down this proposal to eliminate benches with armrests." Folse said she had filed a complaint with the West Virginia Human Rights Commission over the agenda item.
Councillor Butcher, who sponsored the resolution, framed it as a step toward inclusive public infrastructure: "The reason for a resolution like this is for our public infrastructure to be more accommodating to everybody," he said, noting ADA guidance discouraging center bars and highlighting other deterrent features such as spikes and protrusions that can harm people with limited mobility or sight.
Councilors discussed inventory, budget implications and whether the resolution would force immediate replacements. Staff reported a preliminary inventory of benches in public spaces (roughly 15 city benches plus additional benches under partners such as Mountain Line and Beau Park) and said replacement would be implemented over time rather than immediately. After debate the council called the question and adopted the resolution on a 5–2 roll-call vote.
The resolution directs staff to identify hostile features where feasible, consider alternatives, and seek to increase publicly available benches and other placemaking amenities; it also asks staff to consider design guidance and the timing of potential replacements.
