Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Village trustees discuss closed-session use and legal guidance after Marinette decision
Summary
Trustees reviewed nearly two years of closed-session use and heard village counsel recommend reading statutory exemptions aloud, starting sensitive topics in open session and providing training after the Marinette case; trustees asked staff for clearer procedures and a handbook.
Trustee Baldwin presented a review showing 27 closed sessions in 34 board meetings since April 2023 and said most were unanimously approved by attending trustees, but residents had raised questions about transparency and missing recordings. Baldwin said the log and supporting documents are posted and available.
Village attorney Ross Meisel, introduced by staff as the board's legal counsel, advised trustees that the courts (citing the Marinette decision) are changing how the negotiation/bargaining and other closed-session exceptions are applied. He recommended that, for matters that might require negotiation (for example, developer agreements), the board first discuss the issue in open session to explain the circumstances, then go into a closed session only for negotiation parameters, and later return to open session for final approval. Meisel also advised that the presiding officer should read the specific statutory exemption language into the record before a closed session and that agenda language should note the exemption in advance to preserve the option to close the meeting if necessary.
Trustees asked about past practice and recordkeeping. One trustee noted that a few meetings had no available recordings after an open session immediately moved to closed session; another trustee said the board has not always read the statutory verbiage verbatim, but added that much of the ordinance and resolutions are adopted by reference. Trustees asked for steps to reduce legal risk: Meisel offered to present a short training or workshop on open meetings and records and recommended staff include the recommended verbiage on agendas when there is any reasonable possibility of a closed-session item.
Trustees requested that staff develop a written protocol or "four-eyes" work instruction (for example: village manager, village president, attorney, and a second manager/official to review agenda language) and a trustee handbook to be distributed to both new and continuing trustees. The board agreed to follow up with staff to produce clearer guidance and bring materials back in April for review.
The discussion closed with trustees reiterating a commitment to transparency while acknowledging the legal need for closed sessions in some litigation, personnel or negotiation scenarios. Meisel noted nothing is automatically invalid from past practice unless a court rules otherwise, but emphasized that stronger public-facing practices would reduce risk going forward.
